A programme borrows trust before it earns any.
Participants give it the benefit of the doubt because of who runs it and who signed it off.
Companion to the white paper · Learning programmes
Participants arrive trusting the provider's name, L&D's track record and the sponsor's sign-off. Then they test it at work. This page turns the paper into three changes you can make to a programme you already run.
The idea
Participants give it the benefit of the doubt because of who runs it and who signed it off.
If a participant tries the new behaviour and their manager takes the decision back, they learn that the promise didn't hold.
It matters more than the session. Agree the real task, the authority and the review date before anyone attends.
Trust Leader definition Trust is someone's confidence in you with something they care about.
Who the participant relies on
In the paper, each question is pointed at one person: the programme lead, the line manager, the facilitator or the sponsor. Each answers from the participant's side.
The five Trust Questions
Do they believe what I say?
Do they believe I'll do what I said?
Do they believe I can handle what's needed?
Do they feel I really understand them?
Do they believe I act with their interests in mind?
Try it in a programme you already run
Each takes under 15 minutes. None needs software. Each has a trigger, something to say or ask, and a count so you can see whether it is happening.
When: before the participant attends.
"The task I'll practise on is ___. I can decide ___ without further approval. We'll review what happened on ___."
Check: count the conversations held out of those planned, for example 11 of 14.
When: at the first review after workplace practice.
"Name one occasion you used it, who it affected, and what they would say changed."
Check: count the answers that name a real occasion and a real person.
When: for a sample of participants, around day 30 to 60, with agreement.
"What could you decide on your own this month that you couldn't before?"
Check: count how many you asked and how many named a specific decision. Keep the answers as accounts, not scores.
Illustration · fictional data, not a client result
The free trial is for you. Pick one of your own working relationships, choose one behaviour and practise it for real. Here it is with a fictional L&D lead and her programme sponsor.
You and the programme sponsor
Scored 1 (rarely) to 5 (consistently)
What you need from them
Her backing to run a second cohort.
What they care about
Evidence the first cohort changed anything at work.
Biggest gap
Delivery & Consistency
Your Behaviour Playlist
For the behaviour your Trust Map points to
Outcome: you say what will happen next, and by when, before the meeting ends.
Outcome: the sponsor hears about a slipped date from you first.
Reflection
How useful was this activity?
★★★★★
When you told her about the delay first, what did you notice?
"She asked what I needed rather than who was responsible."
Anything else you noticed? · Optional
One meeting. Watch whether it holds.
Who can see this?
Start with yourself
Free for 28 days. Or read the full white paper: the research on transfer, the 6Ds alongside the trust lens, and a worked delegation example.
Trust Telegraph
Short, practical thinking for people whose work depends on other people’s confidence.
Examples on this page are fictional. Hub screens are illustrations. Trust Leader makes no claim of demonstrated results.